Backers of a proposed copper and gold mine in Southwest Alaska “tried to trick regulators by pretending to pursue a smaller project with the intention of expanding” after the project was approved, a report released Oct. 28 by a U.S. House panel said.
The report makes several recommendations, including environmental review process changes to ensure a more inclusive review “of cumulative impacts of projects.”
Mike Heatwole, a spokesperson for the Pebble Limited Partnership, which is seeking to develop the Pebble Mine, said the company has not had time to fully review the report. But “to the extent the report contains any suggestion that we tried to mislead regulators in any way, it is categorically wrong and misinformed of the realities of the Pebble permitting process,” he said in a statement.
The proposed mine is in Alaska’s Bristol Bay region. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has said the region supports the largest sockeye salmon fishery in the world and that it also contains significant mineral resources.
The debate over the project has gone on for years and spanned several presidential administrations.
The report, from Democratic Reps. Peter DeFazio of Oregon and Grace Napolitano of California, said that at the same time a now-former top official with the Pebble partnership told a subcommittee there were “no current plans” for expansion of the proposed mine, the Pebble partnership was seeking to develop an expanded project “and touting that larger vision in pitches to potential investors.”
The same week in 2019 that Tom Collier, then the Pebble partnership CEO, testified before the subcommittee, he and other project leaders “pitched a much longer-term Pebble Mine to investors,” the report said.
The report cited a similar presentation by Pebble leaders dated months earlier and said the slide deck presentation was also being shown to investors in early 2020.
Collier resigned in September 2020.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in late 2020 rejected a key permit authorization for the project. That decision was appealed by the Pebble partnership, which is owned by Canada-based Northern Dynasty Minerals. The appeal has yet to be decided.
Meanwhile, the EPA is weighing whether to proceed with proposed restrictions that would block mining plans. Pebble has called the EPA’s actions premature. But mine opponents have urged the agency to act to stop large-scale mining in the region.
The report, written by Democratic staff, as part of its recommendations urges updates to project review processes. It recommends the Army Corps’ permit application form be updated “to include questions about the envisioned full scope of a project and any anticipated additional permitting.” It said agencies should take into account such things as economic feasibility analyses.
The report also says Congress should explore legislative actions to provide protections for the Bristol Bay watershed.
Reader Comments(0)